Battery Storage Faces Two Year Wait for New Rules That Optim
Stay informed with our
free newsletters

Battery Storage Faces Two Year Wait for New Rules That Optimise its Use

The battery storage industry has welcomed two landmark rulings that create new markets for their technology, but they face at least another two-year wait before the new rules come into effect.

Australia already has six big batteries operating on its main grid – with another five under construction and more than 50 in the pipeline.

But despite the fact that they can perform multiple tasks, their use is severely limited by the restrictions of the current market rules, which were designed for big centralised coal generators and which have only been very slowly adapted to new technologies.

Energy Storage Technologies (EST) Market Report 2022-2032

Energy Storage Technologies (EST) Market Report 2022-2032

Forecasts by Application (Stationary Energy Storage, Transportation Energy Storage), by Stationary Type (Industrial and Military Use, Grid-Related-Utility, Grid-Related-Residential), by Utility Type (Ancillary Services, Peaking Capacity, Energy Shifting, Transmission & Distribution Level), by Industrial Type (Uninterruptible Power Source (UPS) + Data, Telecom Backup Power, Air Conditioning/Refrigeration, Hydrogen Refuelling Stations, Other Industrial/Military Uses), by Technology (Pumped Storage Hydropower, Lithium-ion Batteries, Lead–acid Batteries, CAES, Redox Flow Batteries (RFBs), Other) AND Regional and Leading National Market Analysis PLUS Analysis of Leading Companies AND COVID-19 Impact and Recovery Pattern Analysis

Download free sample pages

As an example, big battery storage projects located next to a wind or solar farm have been unable to do what most people assume they do – back up that wind or solar farm, or optimise or smooth or time shift its output – because the rules require they be registered and dispatched separately.

Likewise, some of the key services that they can provide – including incredibly fast and flexible responses to grid disruptions – are also not recognised by the market.

Big batteries have made several important interventions in the grid to help the lights on, but they have done it for free – and to demonstrate their capabilities – because there is no market to recognise their service.

It’s why state governments such as South Australia and Victoria have had to write direct contracts with the likes of Neoen for its Hornsdale Power Reserve and the Victoria Big Battery to ensure that the services they can offer to protect the grid are available when needed.

That is slowly starting to change. Last week, the Australian Energy Market Commission unveiled draft new rules that seek to solve the “hybrid” problem and allow different technologies to be combined at the same location, and to smooth out the creation of linked assets such as “virtual power plants” that aggregate thousands of smaller household batteries and other distributed energy resources.

The AEMC has also finalised its rules on the creation of a new “fast frequency response” market, where batteries and other inverter based technologies can be rewarded for delivering rapid response to grid disruptions in less than two seconds.

But neither new rule will be in place for another two years. The FFR proposal, although the rule has been finalised, needs the Australian Energy Market Operator to define the technical details, and as has been seen in discussions to date, there is a lot of controversy over how it should be done.

“It’s glacial,” said one battery storage executive, who preferred to remain anonymous because of the sensitivities of the discussions. “It’s slow, but it’s a great outcome,” said another.

The hybrid rule is also only at draft stage, despite being put forward by AEMO in 2019, which means it is open for further consultation and a final decision later this year. Even then, the AEMC says, it won’t be in place until 2023.

Despite the slow rollout, the overall response to the proposals is positive, even if some of the details – such as the AEMO discussions on the FFR technologies, and the draft hybrid rules – are yet to be worked out.

“Better integration of storage will support security and reliability, leveraging the capabilities of renewable technology to keep the lights on for consumers, at the lowest possible cost,” Clean Energy Council chief executive, Kane Thornton, said in a statement.

However, the CEC said it had some concerns about an ongoing requirement for battery projects to pay additional network charges during their operation, effectively doubling up the costs imposed on energy storage projects.

“This will result in batteries paying twice – both to connect to the system to supply energy as well as to take energy from the system,” Thornton added.

“This fails to recognise the significant benefits that batteries can provide, as both load and generation, which can help support the stability and security of the system.”

Joel Gilmore, the head of energy policy and planning at Iberdrola Australia, says unlocking hybrid facilities, including DC coupled facilities, will further reduce the cost of renewable generation and storage and deliver even lower prices for consumers.

“We support establishing a new registration category that will simplify how participants and AEMO operate storage in the grid,” he said of the hybrid rules. “We strongly support the flexible options for registering semi-scheduled and scheduled units separately behind a connection point.

“Continuing to improve the connections process and how performance standards are assessed will be critical to avoid project delays, particularly for hybrid facilities where multiple technologies are being developed simultaneously.”

CEO of SwitchDin, Andrew Mears, said that the current rules were quite restrictive on how households and small businesses could participate in virtual power plants, and the AEMC’s proposed rules would give more options to customers.

“For home or business owners to participate in a virtual power plant, they currently have to sign their battery or other assets up to a specific package with an electricity retailer,” Mears said.

“This means that they have to accept all terms that are given to them. The new ‘aggregator’ role proposed by AEMC will give battery owners more freedom and allow home and business owners to pick and choose how their battery is used without being tied to a retailer or VPP.”

German battery producer sonnen, now owned by Shell, and which has made a recent push into the Australian market with local production facilities and involvement in government battery rollouts, said it would now adapt its own virtual power plant platform so that it could participate in the new fast frequency response market.

“The AEMC’s proposed rule reflects how dynamic home batteries are in strengthening the grid and sonnen will refine our virtual power plant technology to support the new faster frequency for demand response when the rule is passed,” sonnen Australia boss Nathan Dunn said in an emailed statement.

Source: Renew Economy
Date: Jul 20, 2021

Share this news: